Bödöre’s detention was different from that of Jankovska and Zsuzsova


After the Constitutional Court (Constitutional Court) dominated in mid-December that his rights had been violated within the choice on Bödör’s custody within the Cattle case, the Supreme Court (NS) was anticipated to launch him. It lastly occurred on Thursday. However, the oligarch additionally confronted costs in different instances, so there was a risk of his re-arrest. The Valčeky case lastly broke his neck.

However, many have been stopped by the actual fact that the investigators waited a number of hours earlier than the oligarch was detained once more. In the case of Alena Zsuzsová (48) or Monika Jankovská (50), the 2 accused police have been detained once more instantly after their launch from custody. NAKA got here to the oligarch just a few hours after his launch. “He’s been along with his household earlier than,” Para described moments of re-arrest for TV JOJ.

The police act and will act only in accordance with the law.  This was stated by the Minister of the Interior Roman Mikulec (OĽANO) in response to statements by the chairman of the opposition Smer-SD, Robert Fico, concerning the detention of businessman Norbert B.

Read extra

Mikulec responds to Fico’s criticism of Bödör’s arrest: Police act in accordance with the LAW!

As the rector of the Academy of the Police Force, Lucia Kurilovská, defined, there’s a distinction in these instances from Bödör. Zsuzs was launched after a acquittal within the case of the homicide of Ján Kuciak († 27), and everybody knew the date when the listening to would happen. At the identical time, she was lately accused of plotting the murders of Maroš Žilinka (51) and Daniel Lipšic (48). For Jankovska, the state of affairs was related, though solely detention was determined. “It is due to this fact comprehensible that she was turned over instantly after her launch, as a result of within the second case they is also afraid of influencing witnesses or fleeing and so on,“Kurilovska mentioned. However, she added with one breath that different elements performed a serious position in Bödör’s case: “NAKA did not need to know when NS would resolve, so that they detained him later. I feel so. “

Para additionally revealed the act for which he was detained. “The trigger of bribery within the case during which the final act was made on May 12, 2021. It is absolute illegality and expediency,” the lawyer mentioned, including that there was psychological stress from the police. Kuriľovská additionally commented on the alleged motion of the investigator: “If it is actually the case that there hasn’t been any motion since May 12, it is startling, particularly if the individual was in custody in one other prison case. It was due to this fact potential to interrogate her on this prison case as effectively. “

Norbert Bödör

Read extra

FACKA for Bödör: He solely loved his freedom for just a few hours, THIS is the REASON for his additional detention!

Police spokeswoman Andrea Dobiášová additionally revealed one other process: “The investigator has taken all the mandatory steps and, after evaluating them, will resolve on the subsequent steps.” She added that the detention was linked to fears that the accused may affect witnesses or proceed the crime.

Norbert Bödör was detained again after his release.  This time because of the Valčeky case.

Norbert Bödör was detained once more after his launch. This time as a result of of the Valčeky case.


However, a number of specialists are protesting in opposition to such practices. “Detention is a deadly violation of elementary human rights and ought to be used solely to the extent mandatory. Law enforcement authorities should perform all acts and interrogations as quickly as potential. “ mentioned Czech lawyer Lukáš Trojan. For the aim of “turning” the accused, nonetheless, solely lately for pravnelisty.sk the choose of the regional court docket Peter Šamko identified: “Courts mustn’t robotically settle for ‘turning’ the accused in entrance of the jail gate and take them into custody in one other prison case, simply so that the earlier custody can proceed on a steady foundation.”

Author: npk

Comments are closed.